The Exercise Paradox: The Trade-Off Between Performance And Aging [New Research! Plus the top 5 most annoying running partners!]

AppId is over the quota AppId is over the quota

 


 Stylin’ at the start line!


Ever had a super annoying running partner*? There’s The Perma-Injured – the person who always has something wrong with him/her, whether it be fallen arches or a sore knee or a blocked aura or whatever. New day, new injury. Then there’s The Whiner – the one who complains about the weather, his shoes, the TV programming, her husband and the chia seeds stuck in their teeth. Don’t forget The Competitor – the guy or girl who is always trying to stay two steps ahead of you, elbowing you off the sidewalk, telling you all their past race times or otherwise letting you know how much you suck at running. Oh and my personal favorite, The Hip Magnet – the fellow runner who apparently has a magnet in their hip that makes them run so close to you that if you were in a tampon ad you’d be holding hands and braiding daisy chains. No matter how many ninja moves you do to try and regain your personal space they will inexorably be drawn back to your side. If you’re lucky they’ll offer you a piggy back.


Well, on Saturday I was That Annoying Person. I ran my first official Colorado race with my friend M. (The other two have just been “family fun run 5ks”) I’m not sure if it was the beautiful sunshine, the perfect running weather, the excellent company or the gorgeous course that put me in such a bad mood but right around mile 4 I turned into The Ranter – the person who picks one tedious topic to keep going on and on about.


To be fair we were running out of new ground to cover – our training runs had taken care of our childhoods, our favorite candies, our kids, fave books, potty training and that one time we both couldn’t stop quoting The Princess Bride. And when you’re running for an hour or more with no music, you have to talk about something. It was either a rant or another pointless story about me accidentally mooning someone or making lasagna with tuna fish**.


So what was the topic I’d chosen to go off on? Running! Of course! Actually, I “treated” M to my now-infamous speech about how too much exercise can harm your health, make you gain weight/fat *** and can even shorten your life. Of course I’ve had to learn this the hard way, with my overexercising debacle. But it turns out that what our bodies consider “too much” may be even less than we’d previously thought. Or at least of a different type of exercise pattern than what we’ve been taught to admire and glorify.


Remember the TED talk from Dr. James O’Keefe, the world-famous cardiologist and reformed marathoner, about his research into cardiovascular exercise? (You should really listen to the whole thing if you haven’t heard it yet! Positively fascinating.) In his talk he says, “The fitness patterns for conferring longevity and robust lifelong cardiovascular health are distinctly different from the patterns that develop peak performance and marathon/superhuman endurance. Extreme endurance training and racing can take a toll on your long-term cardiovascular health.” That’s doctor-speak for what’s good for your ego may not be what’s good for your body.


A recent talk by Dr. Rhonda Patrick delves into the mechanism behind the biological trade-offs we make when we workout hard and for long periods of time. It turns out that the thing that makes us better athletes – human growth h0rmone and the consequent IGF-1 signalling – is also the thing that can shorten our lives. Yeah, you read that right.


First, the basics (which I gleaned from Wiki, WebMD and other ‘net sources so feel free to correct me if I get this wrong!): Human growth hormone is a hormone produced in your pituitary gland. HGH causes your liver to release insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). You’ve probably heard of HGH as a “miracle” hormone – it’s the whole premise of the dubious HCG diet that got so much attention a couple of years ago – because IGF-1 has lots of cool benefits in your body and therefore everyone wants more of it.


HGH/IGF-1 promote muscle growth, enhance muscle recovery, increases lean muscles mass while simultaneously decreasing fat, and it boosts cognition by both helping the brain grow new neurons (yep, it’s possible) and by preventing neurons from dying off. Too little HGH and your growth is stunted, your brain function decreases and your sex drives plummets. Stronger, leaner AND smarter? Who wouldn’t want all that awesomeness?? This is why HGH remains one of the hottest and most abused “performance enhancing” drugs on the market. (You can only legally get it with a doctor’s prescription, by the way.) I think it says a lot that it’s one of the handful of drugs Lance Armstrong actually admitted to using.


However, HGH has one major side effect that people don’t talk about much: It decreases longevity. The more HGH you have, the shorter your life. First, animal studies have shown a 50% (!) increase in life span when the animals are deficient in HGH/IGF-1 with the converse also being shown true in research. Since it’s impossible to do human studies of the like, scientists looked at people who genetically can’t produce much HGH. The lower their IGF-1, the longer they lived – so much so that living to 100 is directly linked to having a low HGH “polymorphism”, i.e. genetic variation. (The reason for this didn’t make a ton of sense to me – something about IGF-1 increasing oxidative stress on your cells and oxidation is the #1 cause of aging. If you can answer this better, please help me out!)


So wait – Stronger, leaner, smarter AND dead younger? Who wouldn’t want all that… oops. It turns out that according to Dr. Patrick, it’s a trade off. There are times in our lives when HGH is naturally very high and other times when it’s naturally very low and there’s not much we can do about that. But there is one major way to increase HGH – with exercise. And the harder the exercise, the bigger the spike in HGH. It’s one of the many touted benefits of high-intensity interval training methods.


We often think of exercise as a way to extend our lives – and it can be, if you do it right. Exercise has a long, well-proven list of benefits physically, mentally and spiritually. Nobody is telling you that sitting on your butt and eating chips all day is a good plan. (Okay sometimes it is – we’ve all had those days! – just not always.) But according to Dr. Eric Larose’s research, presented at the Canadian Cardiovascular Congress 2010, it can take your heart up to 3 months to completely recover from the stress of a marathon. If your goal is to become a high-level athlete then know you are sacrificing some health farther down the line. If your goal is simply to be as healthy as you can be then know that you are sacrificing a level of performance. The trick is to find the balance where you get the benefits of increased HGH without reaching the levels where it markedly shortens your life.


You may remember Micah True – he’s the ultramarathoner (and subject of the famous book Born to Run) who tragically died on a routine 12-mile run at the relatively young age of 58. Not only was he an elite athlete but he was a paragon of athletic virtue, eating a clean healthy diet and getting lots (and lots and lots) of exercise, yet he died of heart disease – the very thing that a clean diet and lots of exercise is supposed to help prevent. An autopsy found his heart to be very enlarged, particularly the left ventricle, with scar tissue covering it – one expert opined that physically it was worse than if he’d been a life-long smoker. Alarmists said this was proof that running is bad for us. Apologists said this was a fluke and True was a victim of bad genes combined with unfortunate circumstances. I think both are wrong. Exercise is not an all-or-nothing endeavor. The problem with using True as a model or cautionary tale is that the damage can start long before you die so using a catastrophic example when talking about general health is not very useful. And, as heart-rending as they are, neither are anecdotal tales. But there is a middle ground between ultra-marathons (or even just marathons) and Lifetime TV couch marathons.


So where exactly is that middle ground? It’s probably different from person to person but Dr. O’Keefe says that his research has found it’s running 2-3 miles at a moderate pace (or 20-30 minutes of cardio) several times a week. For many people it’s a struggle to do even that much but for some of us the struggle is in not getting drawn into the longer-better-faster-stronger mentality of triathlons, marathons and other longer endurance activities. Am I saying that doing a Triathlon will kill you? It’s almost certain it won’t – at least not in the moment you’re doing it. And I do think there’s some benefit in doing something Big for the satisfaction of accomplishing it. But just as there are physical tolls incurred, so there are mental, economic, time and practical costs involved. It’s important to look past the ego and the hype and make sure you are weighing all the risks when you decide whether or not to attempt something.


[TL;DR] If you take only one thing from my Running Rant, let it be this: When it comes to exercising for good health, something is better than nothing but more of something is not always better.


And now you know what it’s like running a race with me! Want to douse me with a cup of Gatorade yet? To all my friends who’ve had to endure variations on this rant over the past few years (learning curves are full of sharp points), I promise not to torture you with this again!


Does this longevity vs performance trade-off surprise you? What’s your “sweet spot” for exercise where you feel awesome and healthy but not worn down and single-focused? Anyone have a super-annoying running buddy to add to my list??


 


 Sweaty at the stop line!


*Make no mistake, I’m not denigrating them. I have been ALL of these people on one run or another. Dear running partners, I’m sorry. Thanks for putting up with me!


**grossgrossgrossgrossgross I thought it would be like tuna casserole. It was not.


*** M and I discussed this on the drive home and we both feel “squishier” than before we started training for this race. (Mine is actually true – I gained 3% body fat. (Don’t worry, I’m not stressing over it!) M’s was more of a feeling and frustration that after all this running she hadn’t lost weight – not that she needs to!!) She was surprised by this. I, alas, was not. Gotta get back to my weight lifting!!

Tagged as: exercise addiction, marathons, Micah True, over exercise, research, running, triathlons

13 Real Things You Are Really Doing Really Wrong at the Gym. For reals. [Forget heart rate zones and protein powder, these tips will make your workout more magical than She-Ra riding a unicorn over the Bermuda Triangle.]

Después de que alguien robó mi foto y lo usó para Thinspiration me decidí a retractarme y hacer mi propio (no) Fitspo

A month ago I have a sweet note from my brother, who is on the Internet would have a fiber optic cable connected to its parent brain style... If it wasn't so simple. (I think your brain could be the cloud. Shh.) Anyway. "Uh, Shosh?" wrote to me. (Yes, Shosh is my childhood nickname. Do not ask). "I believe that someone is stealing your stuff..." And he sent me a link to a website that had stolen some of my photos, stripped of my copyright and the redesigned as "fitspiration".


First, lest you think that they were fetishizing my particular body, let me disillusion you. Photos were of my practice and used them as inspiration for training until vomiting. Secondly, you all know how I feel about fitspiration. It is basically thinspiration in a sports bra. Thinspiration is Miley Cyrus of Internet memes: provocative, in the face and with intelligence (grammar) of a child's 3rd grade. Oh, and are bad for the girls.


At first I was real angry my photos (and my message) were being as stolen. But I quickly slipped into a depression semi because this sort of thing - well, the part stealing - it has been happening since my blog has more than 5 readers. There are several web sites that "scraping" my messages daily *, taking all my hard written text and photos, slapping directly on your website and claiming them as their own. It is outrageous, is unfair and there's not much that can be done that all sites are hosted in countries that are too busy suffering under oppressive regimes concerned with intellectual property rights. But my favorite story of theft was when a major news station of United States tore off some photos of my blog kickboxing and used them to illustrate their newscasts, as if they were pictures. I learned about this when you call a friend in OHIO to wonder was on his newscast. Sigh.


Stealing is bad enough, but what I really eat is that people are using my face and my body disorderly to illustrate their own thoughts and behaviors. This really hurts because I have fought against my eating disorders, particularly my addiction of the exercise, for so many years. I have worked very hard to reach a place healthy (ish) and see my body behind some stupid anorexia how-to disguised as a "Board-shaped" makes me want to hit someone.


But as I am not an unbelievable hacker and not an amazing Boxer, I decided to do my best. I took my own photos of my own "FITSPIRATION" by God! (Or perhaps succumbed to the latest trend to snap "healthies"? healthy + selfie = healthie.) You are welcome).


These are the messages that I would like to use my image to get there:


 


Doesn't matter it that in contact with her thighs. Never heard of "bikini season". With it, the cheese is as delicious as it is a command to smile. Let's keep it that way. And with a smile so big that you need pants anyway?


 


As I hate that nonsense "blaming others" all that people say when you say you find a friend to training with. It is the work of her personal trainer. First, they are friends. Do not drill sergeants, teachers of task or guilt-inducing. Well done, a gym partner can be your great ally in the gym and out.


 


Even big boys (and girls) need rest. I have no shame in saying that it is now. The only one who wins if you vomit is the dog.


 


Heaven help me if ever a day where the stunting in random places becomes socially unacceptable.


 


There are plenty of good reasons for training. This happens to be my favorite. (Thanks Bekky!) Likewise, live with my children is already a circus, as well as I could do it official with a small act of Trapeze, truth?


 


Oh and never lets a good two-way go to lose! That is what he said.


 


They are great friends who give you a shoulder to cry. Friends that give you to lift your arms are wonderful. But friends who turn their backs to scale so can shout "I'm the Queen of the world!" are priceless.


Holy strange God.


What are you saying? If you have to turn something to your Board's motivation, such one of these? (Or something like that? I'm not saying I have the lock in impressive non-fitspo) If you do your own photo anti-fitspo, what would it say?


* I was told that the only reliable way to keep people from poaching my stuff in this way is to go to a partial RSS feed (or I do not think at all) but when guys from that surveyed, 90% of my readers said that it could be low on my blog if I went to a format "read more". And I love more than hate scrapers all way!

Tagged as: copyright law, fitspiration, healthies images, motivation, pinterest, thinspiration

A Quick Note About Friending Me on Facebook

 


If we’re FB friends you get to read lots of stuff like this! Which will either entertain you or drive you nuts, depending on how you feel about people who FB about their kids.


So I’ve been getting a ton of friend requests on Facebook – lest you think I’m super popular (hair flip implied), the VAST majority are spam/phishing accounts. However, as I sorted through them this weekend I found a couple that I THINK are from readers of this blog? I’m happy to be FB friendies with any of you that want to – especially since I don’t have a FB page for this blog (too lazy, couldn’t maintain it).


There are two ways to do this:


1. You can sign up to “follow me” which will just mean you can see my public updates (which are all of them, basically). This does not require my approval. I won’t see your stuff and we won’t be official “FB friends” but you can see random quotes from my kids and weird invasive questions for articles I”m working on and what I’m having for dinner… scintillating stuff like that.


2. Or you can send me a Facebook friend request. Then you still get to read all that stuff but I can see your stuff and you can comment on whatever. (Just be warned there’s a lot of gynecology talk going on… for whatever reason Shape has designated me their go-to girl for all things lady business.) But if you send me a friend request, include a note with your request telling me you’re from this blog or you read my book or whatever. I will not accept your FR without a note! I’m sorry I just don’t have time to sort through everyone’s stuff and try and decide who’s legit and who’s trying to farm my info for nefarious purposes.


 

Can Exercise Really Cure Insomnia? 5 Tips to Help You Sweat Your Way to Sleep. [Okay, gross visual. Sorry.]

 


Bad news: Jelly Bean has croup. (A virus characterized by a nasty cough that kind of sounds like a seal barking. Which my boys found hilarious. Which made Jelly Bean upset. Which made her cough harder.)


Good news: She got a dose of steroids at the pediatrician’s this morning and she’s like a new kid. Modern medicine really is a miracle. (Except that she’s ravenous. I’ve never seen her eat like this! It’s kind of funny – she just ate 4 pretzel buns, one after the other, only stopping to tell me, “these is the bestest food I’ve ever had!!”)


Tired news: But that meant that I spent most of last night awake – holding her upright, rocking her, taking her in a steamy bathroom and then out into the cold night air. (The hot/cold thing is supposed to help open their airways – I learned it from Anne of Green Gables. And the pediatrician also recommended it.) And then watching her fitfully sleep just in case she, you know, stopped breathing. Thankfully she’s fine now but I didn’t sleep at all and now I’m a walking zombie.


Exhaustion makes me incoherent and incoherence leads to awesome interviews, as I found out today when I tried to do some for an article I’m working on. (I called one poor guy the wrong name four separate times. It wouldn’t have been so bad except it was a different name every time. He probably thought I was drunk.) Fortunately, unless interrupted by a kid emergency, sleeplessness isn’t usually a problem for me. Don’t ask me how I dodged the insomnia bullet – with my anxiety disorder and general high-strung-ness you’d think I’d be a shoe-in for the sheep-less sleeplessness but if I have one God-given talent, it’s the ability to fall asleep anytime, anywhere. But for the 60 million Americans who suffer from insomnia, my brutal night and consequent ditzy day are the norm. (Did you know you can actually die from insomnia?!) And I think Son #2 might be one of them. He has a terrible time getting to sleep most nights.


So I was super excited when Shape assigned me a story about the new research into using exercise as an aid for insomnia. Anyone who has insomnia can tell you that laying in bed watching the numbers on the clock change and telling yourself to just sleeeep already! doesn’t work. And that whole counting sheep nonsense? Only works for Little Bo Peep, lucky girl.


“Sleep is the fuel of life.” Gale Green, author of Insomniac, says. “It’s nourishing; it’s restorative. And when you are deprived of it, you are really deprived of a basic kind of sustenance.”


Insomnia can be as difficult to treat as it is frustrating, so what does help?  Exercise is one of the first things doctors often recommend but how well it helps you skydive into snoozeland isn’t quite that simple. It’s not simply a matter of “wearing yourself out” so you’ll pass out. A new study from Northwestern University reports that while exercise can be an effective tool to help you get a good night’s sleep, there are a lot of factors that determine how effective it will be.


Director of the behavioral sleep program at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and lead researcher Dr. Kelly Glazer Baron says she first decided to look at the sleep-exercise connection after having multiple patients complain that getting their sweat on just wasn’t helping them doze off. While it’s been known for a long time that exercisers sleep better, researchers haven’t been sure exactly why. “It may have to do with resetting the stress response,” Baron explains. “We think that one reason people with insomnia can’t sleep is that their stress response is overactive.  I tell my patients- your brain is doing 60 mph and everyone else is going 45!” So Baron designed a study to examine what type of exercise helps with insomnia. Here are her tips:


1. Consistency is key. Like so many things in life, just sticking with it is half the battle. The study followed 11 women with insomnia who were assigned to exercise 3-4 times per week for at least 30 min at 75 percent of their maximum heart rate. What they found was that while exercising on a single day didn’t improve that night’s sleep, after 16 weeks of consistent exercise all the participants were falling asleep faster and sleeping nearly an hour longer.


2. Time of day matters. Baron says that exercising too close to bed can negatively affect sleep so the study participants were instructed to do their exercise between 1 and 5 p.m. although earlier would work fine as well.


3. No need to kill it in the gym. Brazilian researchers found in a 2010 study that while brisk walking helped participants fall asleep in half their usual time and sleep longer, higher intensity activities like running and weight lifting did not have this same effect. And participants in the Northwestern study only worked out 3-4 days a week at most.


4. Be patient. The improvements didn’t happen overnight for the participants. “On the days that subjects exercised, they didn’t sleep any better,” Baron says. “However, they exercised more after nights with better sleep. The results tell us that exercise is not a quick fix for insomnia and takes a while to improve sleep.”


5. Do it. ”People have to realize that even if they don’t want to exercise, that’s the time they need to dig in their heels and get themselves out there,” Baron said. “Write a note on your mirror that says ‘Just Do It!’ It will help in the long run.”


Any of you have insomnia? Does exercise help you at all? Any other tips I could try with my son?? Anyone else a total Anne of Green Gables fangirl?


Update: So Jelly Bean just wandered out of her room as I was publishing this post (10 pm) to tell me she “has the snots” and can’t get them out. Poor thing is super congested. Looks like it might be another long night… sigh.

Tagged as: cure, exercise, insomnia, research, sleep research, treatment

Jillian Michaels Calls Size Acceptance “Bullsh*t”: Brutal honesty or just brutal?

AppId is over the quota AppId is over the quota

 


 Poor T-Rex! I’m so worried about him! Those shorty arms can’t be healthy!


I’m basically the most insecure person I know. That may be partly because I don’t live in other people’s heads and spend too much time in my own. Or it may be because I watched too much “Daria” when I was younger. But still. I’m always wondering if I’m measuring up to people’s expectations. Am I nice enough? Pretty enough? Kind enough? Thin enough? Smart enough? Funny enough? Enough for what, you may ask. Enough to be loved. And I don’t know whether to punctuate that last sentence with a duh or a sigh. You choose.


But! I’m doing a lot better with that than I used to – in the worst of my eating disorder I’d be so paralyzed by my fear of not being “enough” that I simply couldn’t get dressed. I’d have a teary breakdown nearly every morning. Everything I put on made me feel like a failure because it made me look “fat.” And, in my messed up brain, fat = failure. These days, while I still have a really hard time getting dressed, I’m able to see it for what it is and force myself out of my closet anyhow. I’m still insecure but at least I’m insecure and out of the house. And I even have days now where I look at myself and think “I’m awesome!” (My husband, however, still bears the scars from earlier days of being perpetually late to everything  - now whenever I ask him how my outfit looks he immediately responds, “You look beautiful. DON’T CHANGE YOUR CLOTHES.” )


Anyhow, it was this insecurity that my mind immediately went to when I watched this interview with super celeb trainer Jillian Michaels. The sound is super quiet so here’s the transcription:


XO Jane Reporter, Emily: A lot of our readers are really into size acceptance and Health at Every Size. Your brand is so aligned with weight loss, I just wonder how you feel about exercise for fitness vs. exercise for weight loss.


Jillian: I don’t even really know what that means. I’ll define health for you. If your cholesterol is good, your blood sugar’s good, your blood pressure is good, that to me is healthy. I believe that you should accept yourself as every size. But I’m not gonna sit here and pretend that you’re physically healthy at every size because you’re not.


And I also don’t believe that even though you might be 100 pounds overweight, you’re going, “Oh I’m good the way that I am.” BULLSHIT. I don’t believe that you don’t wake up in the morning and feel uncomfortable in your skin. I don’t believe that you don’t feel insecure when you pick your kid up from school. I don’t believe that you don’t feel uncomfortable when you’re naked in front of your husband or your wife for that matter. I don’t believe you.


So while it is critical that you love yourself right now to begin any transformation, you’re really loving yourself enough to invest the time in yourself to become physically healthier. My definition of healthy as I said is not a size 2 or a size 4. It’s the numbers that your internist is gonna give you. But I’ve yet to meet a person who is 100 pounds overweight and is a specimen of health and wellness.”


See, my first thought was WAIT, I’M UNCOMFORTABLE picking my kid up from school or being naked. (Hopefully not both at the same time.) Heck, I wake up in the morning (just some mornings, thankfully) and feel uncomfortable in my skin! And I’m not 100 pounds overweight.  People, detractors and supporters alike, like to make “size acceptance” about health but for me someone’s health is a private matter – between them and their doctor – whereas acceptance seems pretty public. First, I really don’t believe that you can tell someone’s health simply from looking at them or from their weight. Second, so what if they’re not perfectly healthy? Who is? Jillian? Someone else’s health has no impact on how much I love, respect or value them. (Although I’d be willing to bet that how much someone is loved, respected and valued has a lot of impact on their health.)


While Jillian started out pretty good, talking about a concept of health based on measurements other than weight (yay!), she kind of switched horses midstream. “But I’m not gonna sit here and pretend that you’re physically healthy at every size because you’re not.” I don’t know about this, honestly. Can you be physically healthy at every size? Probably not. But can you be physically healthy at most sizes? Perhaps. Can you be physically healthy at a much greater range of sizes than society currently deems “healthy”? I think so. Either way though, I don’t like this equating health with acceptance. I want my loved ones (and myself) t0 be healthy but that has nothing to do with my love for them.


Emily paraphrased my unease, adding, “A lot of my discomfort was caused by Michaels’ tone. Her attitude toward fat people seems to go way beyond “tough love” — it feels personal, and unnecessarily harsh. Before I even got out the words, “size acceptance,” Michaels was already rolling her eyes. When she imitated a fat person claiming to be happy with themselves, she affected a high, mocking voice. To speculate about how fat people feel being naked in front of a sexual partner seemed like a nasty low blow.”


And yet I know a lot of people who feel like Jillian is speaking the truth, albeit in a brutally honest way. For them, love is caring about someone’s health. They don’t like to see their loved ones “suffer” (and I only put that in quotes because suffering viewed from the outside can look very different than suffering viewed from the inside). They want to help but it’s hard to fix society’s expectations. It’s much easier to try and fix the person. Who cares about kind if it’s saving their life? Plus, this is Jillian’s job right? I’m certainly not qualified to comment on anyone’s fitness, health or mental state but as a post-Biggest-Loser community we’ve given her that power. (A power that she’s used to market dubious “cleanse” and “burn” supplements...) I do think that Jillian believes that she’s being loving.


Yet I’ve been going over and over her remarks in my head in the week since I first read them. I think Jillian’s statement felt so personal to me because I desperately need to believe that a) being secure in my own skin need not have anything to do with how large or small said skin is and b) that there are women out there doing just that. It gives me hope, if not for myself, then at least for Jelly Bean. Can Jillian be right? Are all these confident, beautiful, every-sized women that I see really lying or deluded? Can you “accept” yourself while still feeling uncomfortable in your skin? She can’t be right, can she? 


Perhaps her most telling sentence was her first one: “I don’t even really know what that means.”


What do you think – can you be 100 pounds overweight and be honestly comfortable in your own skin? What do you think size acceptance means? Does loving someone mean worrying about their health? Am I sleep deprived and over-thinking this??

Tagged as: health, insecurity, Jillian Michaels, size acceptance

The force Hack have to try: new research gives all the Whiplash, says making a Set of dumbbells can be better than three [what is strength training go?]

Erreur lors de la désérialisation du corps du message de réponse pour l’opération « Translate ». Dépassement du quota maximal pour la longueur du contenu de chaîne (8192) lors de la lecture de données XML. Ce quota peut être augmenté en modifiant la propriété MaxStringContentLength sur l’objet XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas utilisé pendant la création du lecteur XML. Ligne 1, position 9019. Erreur lors de la désérialisation du corps du message de réponse pour l’opération « Translate ». Dépassement du quota maximal pour la longueur du contenu de chaîne (8192) lors de la lecture de données XML. Ce quota peut être augmenté en modifiant la propriété MaxStringContentLength sur l’objet XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas utilisé pendant la création du lecteur XML. Ligne 1, position 8976.

All bodybuilders go to heaven… I actually found this painting at a thrift store. I can’t decide which I love more: the mullet or the muscles. (Or the 3.95 price tag!) Either way this has got to be the most terrifying guardian angel ever.


Let’s just get this out of the way right now: You should strength train. It’s good for you and in far more ways than the usual trope of “super charging your metabolism.” It builds better bone density. It increases neurological connections. It makes it so you can lift the 50-lb bag of cat litter into your cart at Costco without worrying about your heart exploding. And, yeah, it looks prettier and burns more calories than adipose tissue. (Although whether or not you consider that last point a bonus is highly variable on your culture, individual preference and whether or not you’re a serf in the Middle Ages.)


I still don’t love it.


I know. I really want to love it! Don’t worry, I still do it. I do it even when I don’t enjoy it because I’m all about doing/eating/thinking things that are good for me even if I hate them. (Also known as the reason I drink kale smoothies even though the texture of kale completely ruins the “smooth” aspect.) I think it’s the fact that I don’t get a “weight lifting high” like I do a cardio buzz. Although I think some people get an endorphin rush from the hoisting of iron? The good news is that after doing this blog for so many years, I’ve learned to like it a lot more than I used to!


At any rate, when I find a lifting hack that will make my strength workouts more fun, more efficient and/or more effective I’m all over that like brown on rice. And today I came across a fascinating research study that offers just such a magical hack.


Behold: The One-Set Workout.


The experiment is pretty simple: Researchers took a group of young men and divided them into two groups. The first group – we’ll call them Old Faithful – performed a series of 9 exercises targeting different body parts, doing 3 sets of each exercise – which is pretty standard when it comes to lifting. The second group – we’ll call them the Second Group because I’m tired and the only other option I can think of right now is Unfaithful which unfairly makes them sound like man sluts – performed the same series of 9 exercises but did only one set of each, essentially doing 1/3 as much work as the Old Faithful group. Both groups worked out 3 days per week for 8 weeks. All other aspects of their workouts were held constant.


At the end of the 8 weeks, the researchers employed certified strength coaches to test their strength and measure body fat using calipers. The results were surprising. At least to me. Both groups gained about the same amount of strength with the one-rep group barely edging out the Old Faithfuls. But when it came to body composition the one-rep group lost significantly more body fat.


So the group who did less got just as strong and ended up leaner. Things that make you go “huh.”


If you’re like me, that right there is enough to make you want to try it out. But before you (and I) jump on the One-Set bandwagon there are some things to consider (all bulleted, because… I’m tired).


How to do the One-Set Workout


1. Linear progression. The men just didn’t go into the gym and start picking up random weights willy nilly and moving them around. The strength coaches first tested the subjects’ one-rep max (the highest amount of weight you can safely execute a lift with, one time) and then assigned them to do their sets starting at 80% of their 1RM and then progressing each week by adding more weight. You still have to push yourself.


2. 6 reps to failure. Both groups did a weight that had them “fail” – unable to do one more rep – by six reps. SIX. That is not a lot. Especially if you’re used to doing the standard 10-12 reps like I am. These guys were lifting a lot shorter, yes, but a lot heavier as well.


3. Best for beginners/recreational athletes. The researchers noted several times that all their subjects were “recreational” weight lifters rather than advanced athletes or competitive lifters. In the conclusion they noted that the One-Set Workout may not be sufficient for people looking to go beyond functional strength gains/some body fat loss.


 Benefits of the One-Set Workout


1. Less time commitment. The paper’s authors actually did some complicated math to show that the one-set subjects did 1/3 the work of the 3-set group. Which made me giggle. For people who don’t love lifting (like me) or are just new to it, this lesser-volume method may be better at helping people stick to a weight lifting program. Doing three sets and spending 45 – 60 minutes on the weight floor can feel daunting. Popping in for one set seems much more doable and therefore more likely to be done.


2. Less overtraining/workout program fatigue. The researchers also noted that the lesser volume would lessen the wear and tear on the subjects’ bodies as well as their psyches. There’s much less risk of overtraining, even though they are lifting very heavy. The risk of boredom also goes down.


3. Equal strength gains. Science said so. Why would you do three sets when you can get the same functional strength benefits with only one?


4. Better fat loss. Better! Like, whoa.


When it came to this last point, I had to know why. The results even surprised the scientists. Per the paper, “Although the data here clearly demonstrates that strength-training can be viewed as an effective means of subcutaneous fat reduction, the changes noted here suggest that the one-set training group produced the greatest alterations in skinfold thickness. This is surprising given the additional metabolic cost of performing two additional sets of exercise representing 2,592 additional repetitions across eight weeks. There is little scientific research available that states categorically that higher training frequencies produce greater alterations in body composition characteristics. However, lower volume training might maintain protein and muscle glycogen stores, reduce intramuscular damage, and therefore facilitate the capacity of muscle to enhance lean tissue formation.”


Catch all that? They basically said they aren’t sure either why this happened, especially since the Old Faithful group did nearly 2,600 MORE reps (and therefore burning way more calories) than the one-set group. But they theorize that the lower number of reps may have “spared” the muscles and glycogen stores.


File this under Weird But Cool, right after A Boy Named Sue.


Some Caveats


As with any research, it’s not perfect. Here are a few variables that remain unaccounted for and could potentially change the results:


1. Only done on men. Like most fitness research, scientists only looked at men. I’d be offended except… okay, I’m a little put out they didn’t look at women too. Would it have been that much more work to throw some chicks in too? They can have separate charts and everything in the data. In addition to being only men, they were very young and already healthy dudes. And with a sample size of 16, not very many of them.


2. Doesn’t address hypertrophy or advanced athletes. If you’re training for a purpose other than functional strength and basic health this workout probably won’t do you.


3. Diet wasn’t tracked. The subjects were instructed to just eat their normal diet. Which may offer one explanation for the fat loss: more exercise = more hunger. So perhaps the 3-set group ate more afterward since they’d worked more? It’s a phenomenon also seen in other types of exercise. (Although people don’t talk about it much. Which is why exercise is great for maintaining a weight loss but not so great for losing weight.)


All in all this feels revolutionary to weight lifting like Tabata training (or the “4 minute miracle”) was to cardio. Again, science shows that short-and-tough workouts can be as effective (and even better in some ways) than longer and slower ones. It’s a small study but considering it tells me what I already want to hear (I can admit that!), I think it’s definitely worth me trying it out!


Do you love strength training? Hate it? What program do you follow??

Tagged as: fat loss, maximum efficiency, reps, research, sets, strength gain, weight lifting

What’s Your Worst Laundry Disaster? I’ll Tell You Mine if You Tell Me Yours! [Tide Pods $100 Giveaway!]

AppId is over the quota AppId is over the quota “For not as good results drag behind car through puddles and blow dry on roof rack.” YESSSS! I have actually done this. (Not on purpose but it still ended up with a nice fresh scent!)Disaster was in the cards, er, dryer sheets, from the beginning on that fateful day. Whether it had been too many years of living in the pampered comfort of an en suite washer and dryer or just one more ignominy to be suffered during our protracted stint 0f hotel living, I should have known things were going to go badly when I hauled my family-of-six’s laundry up three flights of stairs only to discover I needed my hotel key to open the laundromat. The hotel key that was sitting on the dresser in my locked hotel room. (Is it still an omen of disaster if you completely fail to see it? I mean, what would have happened had the Hobbits looked up at the sky of Middle Earth and mistook the Eye of Sauron for Jupiter on a clear night?)So I trekked down to the front desk to ask them to open my door – a process that took a tedious twenty minutes of waiting, verifying and re-keying – and then I marched back up all those stairs, opened the door to the laundry and dumped my clothing in the only washer. Which is when I realized they were pay machines. (Because duh.) Back down the stairs I trotted, found some bills, made a second trek to the front desk for change and then back up again all the while praying that no one else had chucked my stuff on the floor. (At least I remembered that much from my college laundromat days.)

I shoved the quarters in (FOUR DOLLARS a load – pretty sure it’s laundromats that pushed Robin Hood into a life of petty crime), got ready to press start and… no soap. I had brought no laundry soap. Hadn’t even bought any actually. And there was none to be found anywhere in the laundry room. A garbage can might have been kicked. And then I headed back down the stairs to the front desk where the night clerk said dryly, “Have you ever done laundry before?” before handing me a sample pack of two Tide detergent Pods. Yay! Exactly what I needed for my two loads!


As I walked back down the hall I realized that a task that normally took me two minutes at home had now sucked up more than 45 minutes. I decided to give myself a break and take the elevator up the three flights. Just as the doors were closing, a woman carrying her own very large laundry basket wiggled in. “Are you Paris Hilton on vacay or just moving in permanently?” I joked, eyeing her Matterhorn of wash .


She gave me a look of pure exhaustion and answered, “We were just evacuated because of the forest fires. This is everything we could grab.” Did I mention she was heavily pregnant? And towing a toddler?


Then she eyed the laundry detergent in my hand and I saw her sigh. “I didn’t think to grab any soap.” (And who would? That definitely wouldn’t be on the top of my evac checklist.)


I held out my precious pacs. “Here take mine.” I muttered under my breath, “I’ll just run back to the lobby and grab some more.”


“You sure?” she said, already reaching out.


“Yeah. And feel free to just dump my stuff in the basket by the washer,” I smiled as I let her off on the third floor and punched the down button.


See? Disaster. Of the best kind. For something so mundane, it suddenly seemed like a privilege to be able to do laundry. Even if I did have to face that clerk again. (He must have felt really sorry for this clearly idiotic lady because he gave me 6 samples. Or maybe he was just hoping to not see me anymore that night?)


So: Laundry. Chances are if you’re anything like me you are a) doing it all the time and b) probably doing it wrong. At least that’s what I discovered after reading this handy primer called, oh yes, “Laundry: you’re doing it wrong.” The author washes laundry for a living and so is an expert in all thing whites, brights and too-tights (from too hot drying – #7 on the list of things you’re doing wrong). She even has you branch out from the standard three-pile sort into five piles! It was at this point where I realized that I may be doing my laundry wrong but I’m going to be doing it wrong forever because when you workout as much as I do, have a husband with very specific dress code requirements and kids who do this:


 


then there is no time for deciding what is a “color” and what is a “bright.” I’m going to admit it: I just throw everything in the washer. Together. Then I push some buttons on my machine and away we go. Thus far the laundry gods have smiled on me because I have only dyed a load of whites pink once and everyone seemed to think pink undies were an improvement. Everything else seems to come out relatively clean, even my sweat-soaked gym clothes. So when I was contacted about reviewing Tide Pods, I was instantly down with their whole low-maintenance mojo. (Plus, I still had fond feelings for them from my Gift of the Magi moment in the elevator. Oh and coupons – I still had those too!)


 


How does my already lazy laundry routine get even easier? Now I don’t even have to measure stuff!


 


Even better, Tide Pods go with my fashion sense too. Even though I can’t be bothered to sort my clothes, I do care quite a bit about them being clean and living long, healthy, pill-free lives. Especially my workout stuff. I have kind of quirky style and so I’m willing to spend a bit more to get high-quality stuff that stands out.


   Gotta protect this awesomeness! (I miss you like Crayola misses burnt sienna, Gym Buddy Allison!!)


I’m definitely not a “basics” kind of girl when it comes to workout wear so a lot of my stuff is irreplaceable and I need it to last, well, forever. But while I love to look funky I don’t want to smell funky and one of my biggest laundry issues has been getting that sweat stank out of my clothes. And since the pacs have built-in stain fighters and odor releasers they’re like doing triple duty. (If you still have lingering sweat-smell issues, check out this awesome post about how to use vinegar and other household stuff to get it out!) Plus (shhh!) I love my workout gear so much I often wear it in real life too. For instance, this top is actually an Athleta wicking running top but it also happens to look super cute with my high-waisted floral skirt (the 90's are coming back, yo!)


Jelly Bean’s rocking her florals too! And yeah, I just did a dressing-room selfie. I’m 13.


The best part however is that the Tide Pods are so easy even my kids can use them – no measuring, no spilling, no fussing. (The downside though is that the cute lil’ pacs look like candy so I have to be really careful that only my older kids can reach them.) Tide Pods saved the day again! And I didn’t even have to give them away this time!  But I’d love to share with you – Leave me a comment telling me about your worst laundry disaster to be entered to win a $100 Visa gift card from Tide to keep your gym fashions awesome!


Sweepstakes Rules:


No duplicate comments.


You may receive (2) total entries by selecting from the following entry methods:


Leave a comment in response to the sweepstakes prompt on this post


Tweet (public message) about this promotion; including exactly the following unique term in your tweet message: “#SweepstakesEntry”; and leave the URL to that tweet in a comment on this post


Blog about this promotion, including a disclosure that you are receiving a sweepstakes entry in exchange for writing the blog post, and leave the URL to that post in a comment on this post


For those with no Twitter or blog, read the official rules to learn about an alternate form of entry.


This giveaway is open to US Residents age 18 or older. Winner will be selected via random draw, and will be notified by e-mail. You have 72 hours to get back to me, otherwise a new winner will be selected.


The Official Rules are available here.